Samrukia

Sam-ru-ke-ah.
Published on

John Stewart

Paleoecologist

John Stewart is a distinguished paleoecologist whose work has significantly advanced our understanding of prehistoric ecosystems. With over two decades dedicated to unearthing fossils across Asia and Africa

Cite Feedback Print

Name

Samrukia ‭(‬After the Samruk,‭ ‬a magical bird in Kazakh folklore‭)‬.‭

Phonetic

Sam-ru-ke-ah.

Named By

Darren Naish,‭ ‬Gareth Dyke,‭ ‬Andrea Cau,‭ ‬Fran�ois Escuilli�‭ & ‬Pascal Godefroit‭ ‬-‭ ‬2012.

Classification

Chordata,‭ ‬Reptilia,‭ ‬Pterosauria,‭ ‬Pterodactyloidea.

Diet

Uncertain.

Species

S.‭ ‬nessovi‭

Size

Unknown due to lack of remains.

Known locations

Kazakhstan‭ ‬-‭ ‬Bostobynskaya Formation.

Time Period

Santonian/Campanian of the Cretaceous.

Fossil representation

Lower jaw.

In Depth

       Samrukia is a genus that illustrated the dangers of naming prehistoric creatures by only partial remains.‭ ‬The original describers of Samrukia‭ (‬Naish et al.‭) ‬had a single jawbone that was first thought to belong to an ovirapotosaurian theropod dinosaur,‭ ‬but then later thought to belong to a bird.‭ ‬This raised a lot of eyebrows at the time because the jaw was twice as long as that of an ostrich,‭ ‬so on the surface it seemed that not only had the birds appeared relatively recently,‭ ‬but they had already evolved into large bipedal forms similar to some later forms such as the largest phorusrhacid birds.

       There was however a fundamental flaw to the original describers methods of identification.‭ ‬When comparing known features‭ (‬autapomorphies‭) ‬of the original jaw bone,‭ ‬the original describers looked at birds,‭ ‬but they did not look at pterosaurs,‭ ‬the group of flying reptiles that were common during the Mesozoic.‭ ‬This was pointed out by another palaeontologist named Eric Buffetaut who insisted that the holotype fossil of Samrukia belonged to a genus of pterosaur.‭ ‬After this one of the original describers Darren Naish has also agreed that the holotype fossil belongs to a pterosaur,‭ ‬not a bird.‭ ‬At the time of writing,‭ ‬Samrukia is more widely believed to have been a pterosaur,‭ ‬not a bird.

       The pterosaurs were still quite common during the late Cretaceous with the known species of birds from that time being no threat to their dominance of the skies.‭ ‬Samrukia is considered to have been a pterodactyloid pterosaur which can be loosely described as an advanced form that first began to appear at the end of the Jurassic period.‭ ‬Unfortunately not much more can be said about the genus because it is still only known by a lower jaw.‭ ‬The lack of teeth also confuse things further because a toothless beak can be used for a variety of feeding methods from fish to small animals to perhaps even fruit.‭ ‬This is actually a common problem‭ ‬in understanding pterosaurs since as the Cretaceous period went on,‭ ‬more and more toothless forms began to appear,‭ ‬and so far only a few well known genera such as Pteranodon have had their diets firmly established.

Further Reading

-‭ ‬Samrukia nessovi,‭ ‬from the Late Cretaceous of Kazakhstan:‭ ‬A large pterosaur,‭ ‬not a giant bird‭ ‬-‭ ‬E.‭ ‬Buffetaut‭ ‬-‭ ‬2011. -‭ ‬A gigantic bird from the Upper Cretaceous of Central Asia‭ ‬-‭ ‬Darren Naish,‭ ‬Gareth Dyke,‭ ‬Andrea Cau,‭ ‬Fran�ois Escuilli�‭ & ‬Pascal Godefroit‭ ‬-‭ ‬2012.

SPECIES SPOTLIGHT