Name: Panthera
atrox
Phonetic: Pan-fee-rah lee-oh a-troks.
Named By: Joseph Liedy - 1853.
Classification: Chordata, Mammalia, Carnivora,
Felidae, Panthera.
Species:P. atrox.
Diet: Carnivore.
Size: 1.2 meters high at the shoulder, up to
2.5 meters long.
Known locations: North America, also known from
places in South America.
Time period: Late Ionian to Tarantian of the
Pleistocene.
Fossil representation: Hundreds of specimens, but
often of fragmentary remains.
Classification confusion
Today
the American lion is
usually treated as a sub species of the African lion (Panthera
leo)
which is why it is more commonly credited as Panthera leo
atrox.
However there are a large number of researchers who consider the
American lion to be different enough from the African lion to give it
its own distinct species of Panthera atrox, which
is actually the
original classification. However this is just the tip of the iceberg
when dealing with the classification of the American lion and it’s
easy to become lost amongst the multitude of theories and arguments
about its true position amongst other members of the Panthera
which
includes most modern day big cats.
Early
study of the American
lion led to it being considered similar to a Jaguar (Panthera
onca), and in the mid-1990s it was even considered to
be a sub
species of tiger (Panthera tigris) based upon
similarities to the
skull form. The American lion has also been considered to not be a
lion at all but a distinct big cat that did not survive into modern
times.
Most
palaeontologists however
do agree that the American lion is most closely related to the
Eurasian cave lion (Panthera
spelaea) which is itself is has
also been treated as a distinct independent species as well as a sub
species of the African lion. This has been confirmed by mitochondrial
DNA analysis which shows that the American lion and Eurasian cave lion
were almost identical, although the American does seem to have grown
slightly larger. Current thinking is that Eurasian cave lions crossed
over the Bering Strait into North America during the Ionian stage of
the Pleistocene only to be cut off from the rest of the world by
glacial activity. The resulting small population would have had a
limited gene pool where new traits such as growing slightly larger
would have been easier to establish, especially if the larger size
was of a benefit in the new environment.
A
2016 study (Barnett et al) found that while the
American lion is
closely related to the modern day African lion, it is genetically
different enough to be classed as a distinct species.
Range and ecological role
American
lions seem to have
been widespread across North America with remains known from Alberta in
Canada, past the great lakes to the east coast, all the way back to
the Pacific coast in California. American lions also crossed the
Isthmus of Panama to colonise South America, thus taking part in the
great American interchange that began during the Pliocene. This is
where animals crossed the land bridge between north and South America
to intermix with other animals that were previous isolated. The
earlier spread of large North American predators are thought to have
been responsible for displacing the phorusrhacid
terror birds similar
to Kelenken
and Phorusrhacos
from their positions as top predators from
the South American landscape, as they seem to have already
disappeared by the time that the American lion reached South America.
African
lions can run at high
speed but they are not built for prolonged chases, and will often
give up the chase if a prey animal quickly outpaces them. The
American lion, although larger than the African still had
proportionately short legs that would have enabled it to reach top
speed fast, but would have limited its ability to keep pace with
longer legged animals like horses which could use their wider striding
distance to run even faster. This means that the only way the
American lion could effectively hunt was to use ambush tactics to
surprise its prey so that by the time the target realised the danger it
was in, the lion was already making its strike.
Like
with most predators the
American lion probably approached its intended victim from downwind
which means the prevailing wind would blow the lions body scent away
from the prey so that it did not know the lion was there. Lions like
other cats typically squat down low and creep towards they prey while
staying in long grasses that conceal the lion’s body, but still allow
the lion to see the prey animal because it’s standing above the grass.
Once the lion has gauged that it is close enough it will sprint the
final distance leaping onto the back or flanks of the prey trying to
knock or wrestle the prey so that it loses its footing and collapses to
the floor. Here the lion’s retractable claws come into use to gain
extra grip upon the prey. When not used for grappling with prey these
claws retract back into the paw so that they are prevented from
contacting the ground so that they stay sharp.
Lions
will typically use one
of two methods to dispatch their prey. First is they may try to clamp
their jaws around the throat of the prey and crush the windpipe so that
the prey asphyxiates (becomes starved of oxygen which causes it to
stop breathing, possibly also triggering cardiac arrest). The
second is what is known as the ‘muzzle clamp’, and like the
throat bite this prevents the prey from breathing that leads to
asphyxiation, but here the lion closes is jaws around the tip of the
snout of the animal. The latter method is often used on prey that
manages to stay on its feet despite the lion’s strength.
Pack or solitary hunter?
Although
African lions can be
seen hunting in groups called ‘prides’ today, it is not certain
if the American lion did so as well. In fact evidence from the Rancho
La Brea tar pits in California, USA may suggest that the American
lion was a solitary hunter. The tar pits at Rancho La Brea have
yielded a wealth of different fossil remains with by far the most
numerous being dire
wolves and Smilodon
(better known as the
sabre-toothed cat) while other carnivores like Arctodus
(short
faced bear) and the American lion are in much smaller quantities by
comparison. Dire wolves almost certainly hunted in packs like their
surviving modern day counterparts the grey (Canis lupus),
and
Arctodus was almost certainly a solitary animal like other bears,
both ideas supporting the abundance and lack of their associated
remains. Smilodon also seems to have had a
preference for large prey
like bison which would have been easier to hunt in groups.
Additionally
a 2009 study
of African predators (By C. Carbone, T. Maddox, P. J.
Funston, M. G. L. Mills, G. F. Grether and B. Van
Valkenburgh) played the sounds of animals in distress as if they were
stuck in mud out to the surrounding landscape. The team found
that while large animals that hunted in packs had the lowest
populations in the ecosystem, they were the most likely to respond to
the calls. Individual predators however tended to keep their
distance, perhaps to stay out of the way of the larger predators
that they knew were coming. Again this observational data
corroborates the expanse of some predators at La Brea, while others
are in very small numbers.
While
the above idea is
plausible, there are a few ideas that counter the theory that
American lions were solitary hunters. One is that American lions were
not that common with competition from Smilodon
among other predators
reducing the number of American lions active in Pleistocene
California. It may also be that the American lions in La Brea were
individuals that had been kicked out of prides and were left with
little choice but to try and scavenge the carcasses in the tar pits.
Today, prides of African lions are ruled by a dominant male, but
periodically this male will have to fight other roaming males that will
challenge the male for control of the pride and right to mate with the
females. It is also worth considering that American lions may have
had different behaviour in approaching stuck animals at La Brea with
perhaps one lion walking ahead of the others to test the ground. If
the lion made it to the stuck animal and seemed to be okay the others
would follow, but if the forward lion became stuck the others would
stay back, their core survival instincts holding them back from
placing themselves in danger. Although pure conjecture, this
strategy is similar to how in the army one soldier walks point in front
of the others as they are advancing. The point guard is usually the
first to take enemy fire, but this often allows the main group to
take cover and respond.
One
final note about the
possibility of the American lion hunting in packs is actually
associated with the Eurasian cave lion. In Europe cave art left
behind by early people depicts the Eurasian cave lion as hunting in
groups. With the American lion considered an off shoot of the
Eurasian cave lion, it’s reasonable to infer a greater possibility
of this lion hunting in prides.
Further reading
- Pleistocene remains of the lion-like cat (Panthera atrox)
from the
Yukon Territory and northern Alaska - Canadian Journal of Earth
Sciences 6(5) C. R. Harrington - 1969.
- Mandibular and dental abnormalities of two Pleistocene American lions
(Panthera leo atrox) from Yukon Territory. - B. F.
Beebe & T.
J.
Hulland - 1988.
- Evolution of the mane and group-living in the lion (Panthera
leo): a
review - Journal of Zoology Volume 263, Issue 4, pages 329–342. -
Nobuyuki Yamaguchi, Alan Cooper, Lars Werdelin & David W.
Macdonald
- 2004.
- Phylogeography of lions (Panthera leo ssp.)
reveals three distinct
taxa and a late Pleistocene reduction in genetic diversity. - Molecular
Ecology 18 (8): 1668–1677 - Ross Barnett, Beth Shapiro, Ian Barnes,
Simony W. Ho, Joachim Burger, Nobuyuki Yamaguchi, Thomas F. G. Highham,
H. Todd Wheeler, Wilfred Rosendahl, Andrei V. Sher, Marina Sotnikova,
tatiana Kuznetsova, Gennady F. Baryshnikov, Larry D. Martin, C. Richard
Burns & Alan Cooper - 2009.
- Panthera leo atrox (Mammalia: Carnivora: Felidae)
in Chiapas, Mexico.
- The Southwestern Naturalist 54 (2): 217–222. - Marisol
Montellano-Ballesteros & Gerardo Carbot-Chanona - 2009.
- Craniomandibular Morphology and Phylogenetic Affinities of Panthera
atrox: Implications for the Evolution and Paleobiology of the
Lion
Lineage. - Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 29 (3): 934–945. - Per
Christiansen & John M. Harris - 2009.
- Phylogenetics of Panthera, including Panthera
atrox, based on
craniodental characters. - Historical Biology: 1. - L. M. King
& S.
C. Wallace - 2014.
- Mitogenomics of the Extinct Cave Lion, Panthera spelaea (Goldfuss,
1810), Resolve its Position within the Panthera Cats. - Open
Quaternary. 2: 4. - Ross Barnett, Marie Lisandra Zepeda, Mendoza, Andr�
Elias Rodrigues Soares, Simon Y W Ho, Grant Zazula, Nobuyuki Yamaguchi,
Beth Shapiro, Irina V Kirillova, Greger Larson, M Thomas & P
Gilbert - 2016.
- The fossil American lion (Panthera atrox) in South
America:
Palaeobiogeographical implications. - Comptes Rendus Palevol. 16 (8):
850–864. - N. R. Chimento & F. L. Agnolin - 2017.
- Early Pleistocene origin and extensive intra-species diversity of the
extinct cave lion. - Scientific Reports. 10: 12621. - David W. G.
Stanton, Federica Alberti, Valery Plotnikov, Semyon Androsov, Semyon
Grigoriev, Sergey Fedorov, Pavel Kosintsev, Doris Nagel, Sergey
Vartanyan, Ian Barnes, Ross Barnett, Erik Ersmark, Doris D�ppes, Mietje
Germonpr�, Michael Hofreiter, Wilfried Rosendahl, Pontus Skoglund
& Love Dal�n - 2020.
- The evolutionary history of extinct and living lions. - PNAS. 117
(20): 10927–10934. - Marc de Manuel, Ross Barnett, Marcela
Sandoval-Velasco, Nobuyuki Yamaguchi, Filipe Garrett Vieira, M.
Lisandra Zepeda Mendoza, Shiping Liu, Michael D. Martin, Mikkel-Holger
S. Sinding, Sarah S. T. Mak, Christian Car�e, Shanlin Liu, Chunxue Guo,
Jiao Zheng, Grant Zazula, Gennady Baryshnikov, Eduardo Eizirik,
Klaus-Peter Koepfli, Warren E. Johnson, Agostinho Antunes, Thomas
Sicheritz-Ponten, Shyam Gopalakrishnan, Greger Larson, Huanming Yang,
Stephen J. O’Brien, Anders J. Hansen, Guojie Zhang, Tomas Marques-Bonet
& M. Thomas P. Gilbert - 2020.