Mahakala

Mah-ha-kah-la.
Published on

John Stewart

Paleoecologist

John Stewart is a distinguished paleoecologist whose work has significantly advanced our understanding of prehistoric ecosystems. With over two decades dedicated to unearthing fossils across Asia and Africa

Cite Feedback Print

Name

Mahakala ‭(‬Named after one of the eight protector deities in Tibetan Buddhism‭)‬.

Phonetic

Mah-ha-kah-la.

Named By

Alan H.‭ ‬Turner,‭ ‬Diego Pol,‭ ‬Julia A.‭ ‬Clarke,‭ ‬Gregory M.‭ ‬Erickson‭ & ‬Mark Norell‭ ‬-‭ ‬2007.

Classification

Chordata,‭ ‬Reptilia,‭ ‬Dinosauria,‭ ‬Saurischia,‭ ‬Theropoda,‭ ‬Deinonychosauria,‭ ‬Dromaeosauridae.

Diet

Carnivore.

Species

M.‭ ‬omnogovae‭

Size

Estimated about‭ ‬70‭ ‬centimetres long.

Known locations

Mongolia‭ ‬-‭ ‬Djadokhta Formation.

Time Period

Campanian of the Cretaceous.

Fossil representation

Partial skeleton and partial skull bones.

In Depth

       Named in‭ ‬2007,‭ ‬Mahakala has been widely accepted as one of the‭ ‬most‭ ‬primitive formed dromaeosaurids so far discovered.‭ ‬Key to this idea is the observation that the third metatarsal is not compressed,‭ ‬whereas in more advanced dromaeosaurids and troodonts it is.‭ ‬However another fact to consider is that Mahakala lived during the Campanian of the Cretaceous,‭ ‬a time when dromaeosaurids had long been established.‭ ‬This means that Mahakala was a late surviving form that co-existed with the development of more advanced forms,‭ ‬perhaps specialising as a niche predator.‭ ‬This also does not disprove evolutionary theory,‭ ‬as it should be remembered that evolutionary processes only drive animals to change when there is a need too.‭ ‬When there is no need,‭ ‬an animal’s evolution can slow down and even stop.

       Currently Mahakala is best known from the hind limbs and anterior half of the tail,‭ ‬but forelimb remains are also known and these are interesting as they are proportionally much shorter than the arms of other dromaeosaurids.‭ ‬These shorter limbs may or may not be another primitive feature,‭ ‬they may have been an adaptation unique to the genus.‭ ‬As mentioned above the small size of Mahakala probably meant that it was a specialised hunter of small animals such as lizards and primitive mammals like Zalambdalestes,‭ ‬perhaps even larger insects.‭ ‬This meant that Mahakala did not directly compete with its larger relatives such as the dromaeosaurs Tsaagan and the famous Velociraptor.

Further Reading

-‭ ‬A basal dromaeosaurid and size evolution preceding avian flight.‭ ‬-‭ ‬Science‭ ‬317‭ (‬5843‭)‬:‭ ‬1378‭–‬1381.‭ ‬-‭ ‬Alan H.‭ ‬Turner,‭ ‬Diego Pol,‭ ‬Julia A.‭ ‬Clarke,‭ ‬Gregory M.‭ ‬Erickson‭ & ‬Mark Norell‭ ‬-‭ ‬2007.

SPECIES SPOTLIGHT