Agathaumas

Ag-ah-fow-muss.
Published on

Liam Carter

Paleoanthropologist

Liam Carter explores the roots of humanity by studying early human fossils and artifacts. His ground-breaking work has provided a deeper understanding of our ancestors' lifestyles and social structures.

Cite Feedback Print

Name

Agathaumas ‭(‬Great wonder‭)‬.

Phonetic

Ag-ah-fow-muss.

Named By

Edward Drinker Cope‭ ‬-‭ ‬1872.

Classification

Chordata,‭ ‬Reptilia,‭ ‬Dinosauria,‭ ‬Ornithischia,‭ ‬Ceratopsidae,‭ ‬Chasmosaurinae,‭ ‬Triceratopsini.

Diet

Herbivore.

Species

A.‭ ‬sylvestris‭

Size

Roughly estimated at up to ten meters long,‭ ‬but this estimate is far from certain due to lack of overall remains.

Known locations

USA,‭ ‬Wyoming‭ ‬-‭ ‬Lance Formation.

Time Period

Maastrichtian of the Cretaceous.

Fossil representation

Partial post cranial remains including dorsal‭ (‬back‭)‬,‭ ‬sacral and caudal‭ (‬tail‭) ‬vertebrae‭ (‬16‭ ‬in total‭)‬,‭ ‬partial pelvis and a few ribs.

In Depth

       Agathaumas has been envisioned as a very large ceratopsian dinosaur,‭ ‬potentially as much as ten meters long,‭ ‬that lived in what is now the USA near the end of the Cretaceous period.‭ ‬However most palaeontologists agree that Agathaumas is a highly dubious genus of ceratopsian since it was based upon the description of partial hip bones.‭ ‬Other remains later attributed to the genus as additional species have now been moved over to either the ceratopsians Triceratops or Monoclonius‭ (‬the latter of which is also a dubious genus‭)‬,‭ ‬or over to the hadrosaur Thespesius‭ (‬itself another dubious genus‭)‬.‭ ‬As for the type material,‭ ‬the reason why it is so dubious is because the hip bones between different ceratopsian genera and species hardly vary at all.‭ ‬The only way we could be certain if Agathaumas is indeed a distinct genus is if additional material,‭ ‬ideally the skull could be found for the same individual that the hip bones came from.‭ ‬We would need to be certain however that it is the exact the same individual,‭ ‬as it is near impossible to attribute fossil remains from other sources due to the lack of distinctive features on the type specimens.‭ ‬Only then would we know if Agathaumas is a distinct genus in its own right,‭ ‬or if it actually represents something else.

Further Reading

-‭ ‬On the existence of Dinosauria in the Transition Beds of Wyoming.‭ ‬-‭ ‬Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society,‭ ‬12:‭ ‬481-483.‭ ‬-‭ ‬E.‭ ‬D.‭ ‬Cope‭ ‬-‭ ‬1872. -‭ ‬The monster of Mammoth Buttes.‭ ‬-‭ ‬Pennsylvania Monthly,‭ ‬4:‭ ‬521-534.‭ ‬-‭ ‬E.‭ ‬D.‭ ‬Cope -‭ ‬1873.

SPECIES SPOTLIGHT